Water tank tanked 

The hydraulic report for our construction has returned with the conclusion that a fully charged water system is not required. During the tender stage, a requirement was added to our contract that a  “Fully charged system including a water tank supplying the toilets” was necessary not so much due to the local water infrastructure, but as a council sustainability requirement for new dwellings.

In light of the report, Carlisle  inquired as whether we still wanted the water tank.  I was somewhat confused as I was still under the impression that there was a sustainability requirement.  I went online and referred to the Kingston council’s Integrated Storm Water Management Plan, but could not get a definitive answer.

Therefore, I decided to contact the council directly and speak to the relevant department. There I was informed that this requirement is typically tied to those constructions requiring planning permits i.e. multi-unit dwellings.  Given that we were not in that category, then it was not necessary to install a tank.

Based on that information I informed Carlisle not to proceed with the tank installation. The price quoted was significant and it is something that we can easily look into in the future.


One thought on “Water tank tanked 

  1. Pingback: Building Variation #2 – Our Carlisle Canterbury 44

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s